Well, based on the call I got from my son, S last night, and then after hearing M's anguished and angry messages that later resulted, here's what I think I know.
5
Sometime around 8:00 to 8:30 p.m. last night (Sept 5) M called my son in Raleigh NC. Left him a VM accusing him of participating in MY (her imagined) hiding of money.... etc, etc... and apparently went on to carry on about how she was going to SUE him, get his house, and throw him and his wife and daughter OUT ON THE STREET. S says the message was 5 minute 14 seconds in length.
He was very angry when I got a hold of me, but I calmed him by convincing him he had nothing to gain by interacting with a "crazy person". He agreed NOT to call her, but warned me that if she called HIM, he would be extremely nasty to her. Extremely.
Well, her later messages of the night indicated that she HAD heard from S and gotten an earful. She seemed to claim that he'd left a VM message for her saying that she was "a terrible person, a slut, a whore, a homewrecker and a drunk". She left some angry and offended messages for me, but before she was done, she left sobbing and anguished messages about how "I'm NOT all the things he said I am.... " Plainly he hurt her as he intended.
BUT, my real concern had to do with whether HE had called HER or vice versa.
I talked with him this evening, and ascertained the following (which can be proved out when I next get a Verizon billing.....
M called him roughly 8:00 or so last night. Left a brief VM.
S called back, her phone was off, and he left a brief return message along the lines of "got your call, calling you back" or something, maybe a little ornery, but not offering much reaction.
She shortly after called again -- that call went to VM, and is the 5:14 (length) call referenced above.
And, according to S, later in the evening (not sure of the time) she called him again. HE'D had 3 beers or so -- took the call -- and laid into her in the extremely nasty manner he said he would. Very hurtful, and intended to be so.
I regret that happened, but OTOH, she brought it on herself. She never should have called him in the first place. For any reason. Had she NOT called again into the night, the diatribe he engaged in would not have occurred.
And, frankly, after having his home and family outright threatened, he had a right to be angry.
I'm noting this because I need to check the logs when the bill comes.
Thursday, September 6, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment